Tech: March 2007 Archives

This is prior to bedazzling it.

[ sektie@daemonesque ] [ ~ ]
$ ping 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=4.238 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=9.014 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=3.888 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1.290 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=3.029 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=4.713 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=42.647 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=4.613 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=6.300 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=8.999 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=21.546 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=1.885 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=15.772 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=40.732 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=28 ttl=64 time=9.952 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=29 ttl=64 time=12.267 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=5.100 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=40.102 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=37 ttl=64 time=5.622 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=38 ttl=64 time=3.117 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=41 ttl=64 time=2.477 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=43 ttl=64 time=9.528 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=45 ttl=64 time=4.120 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=46 ttl=64 time=16.481 ms
^C
--- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
49 packets transmitted, 20 packets received, +4 duplicates, 59% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.290/11.560/42.647/12.226 ms
[ sektie@daemonesque ] [ ~ ]
$